Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Strengthen warnings about using pg_dump's -i option.
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Strengthen warnings about using pg_dump's -i option. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200803261730.m2QHUNU05276@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Strengthen warnings about using pg_dump's -i option. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Strengthen warnings about using pg_dump's -i option.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> momjian@postgresql.org (Bruce Momjian) writes: > >>> Strengthen warnings about using pg_dump's -i option. > >> > >> The proposed TODO item was not about doing this, it was about removing > >> the option altogether. AFAICS it's a foot-gun and nothing else --- why > >> do we have it? > > > I thought the simple fix was to just have a better warning and see how > > that works in practice. There was some concern from people about > > removing it without more feedback/warning. I am happy to remove it. > > My proposal would be to continue to accept the option but just ignore it > (ie, error out on version mismatch whether or not -i is given). This > way we wouldn't break any scripts that use the option, but things would > still be safe. A larger question is why the option was added in the first place. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: