Re: [pgsql-www] New email list for emergency communications
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-www] New email list for emergency communications |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080324192014.GI5484@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-www] New email list for emergency communications (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-www] New email list for emergency
communications
Re: [pgsql-www] New email list for emergency communications |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > This is an interesting observation that deserves to be discussed > separately, and relates to the patch queue. Many people want to know > what is happening with the patch queue but having better reporting > doesn't seem to help much the people who are actually processing the > queue, and requires more work. I'm not sure I follow. I tried last week to give some hours for patch review. What actually happened was that I had to wade through a ton of stuff, skipping patches that were already applied, threads that were purely discussion but not patches, threads about earlier versions of some patches. I did manage to find actual patches, but I had then to resort to my own mailbox to get the actual patch to apply and review. Now I can't be sure whether the current commitfest is finished or there are still patches pending review; what patches could use input from me; what patches I could bounce to the next commitfest. Also I don't know what patches we have for the next commitfest. I would gladly give some time to put up a Wiki page to list the patches for the next commitfest. Would that be helpful? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: