Re: New email list for emergency communications
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New email list for emergency communications |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080324124245.O34676@fserv.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New email list for emergency communications ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: New email list for emergency communications
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 11:17:02 -0400 (EDT) > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > >> >> [ BCC to core.] >> >> Right now we have no way to communicate as a group if our community >> email infrastructure isn't working. > > Yes there is. > > jabber.postgresql.org > irc.freenode.net > direct email > > Not to mention how many other services people are using with buddy > lists? :P > >> >> Therefore, I have created an email list on my machine that can be used >> for communication in such situations. It is called: >> >> pgsql-emergency@momjian.us >> >> I envision this as an email list that will allow more rapid recovery >> during email outages. I know many use IRC in such cases but this >> allows notification. Also some don't use IRC. >> > > Everyone in the know uses one of: > > gtalk > yahoo > irc > jabber > >> If you want to be subscribed, please email me privately. I think it >> is particularly important for infrastructure managers to be >> subscribed to this list. > > I would like the requirements defined by the -www and sysadmins teams. > I don't want us to go off and create yet more infrastructure without > full documentation and understanding of the purpose and whether it is > redundant. > > This list is currently redundant as we have the resources and > technology already in place to deal with this. I think you are > attacking the wrong problem Bruce. For how often it happens, its worth nothing: I agree 100% with Joshua here, but, if Bruce wants to create a list on his personal domain (which, in itself is a failure point as it requires that *his* domain is not 100% perfect), it doesn't mean that anyone actually has to *use* it ... I know I never will, since there already exist faster, more reliable, contact methods ...
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: