Re: MySQL to Postgres question
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MySQL to Postgres question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080322181444.3088d7f3@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MySQL to Postgres question ("James B. Byrne" <byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 21:01:19 -0400 (EDT) "James B. Byrne" <byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca> wrote: > Message-ID: <00e101c88b84$df1bbca0$9d5335e0$@r@sbcglobal.net> > > I am not at all > clear as to the implications of this statement but it caused me to > wonder if the primary key values of such tables could be changed > simply by dumping and reloading the database as in an upgrade between > versions. Surely this is not the case? Of course not :). It just has to do with serial being a psuedo type and thus the actual declaration is just an integer with a default. This isn't that other database, we don't munge data :P Joshua D. Drake - -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH5a8GATb/zqfZUUQRAn4JAJ9xzhFNq+pE4QqX7P1OVQNhe6thqgCgpVQC M3zEIsj5c+JTo3mU9XOjJqQ= =RPjl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: