Re: BUG #4040: psql should provide option to not prompt for password
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #4040: psql should provide option to not prompt for password |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080317175218.GG4317@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #4040: psql should provide option to not prompt for password (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #4040: psql should provide option to not prompt for password
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Montag, 17. März 2008 schrieb Tom Lane: > > It's not, IMHO. You don't even know if the local database is where the > > user is intending to connect to. Moreover this presupposes some rather > > obsolete ideas about what connection parameters might need to be given > > on the command line. > > "psql <TAB>" to complete the local database names is a very useful feature > that has existed and been in use for a long time. Agreed. If it can be made to work with remote database when the user already provided the -h option, even better. (And while at it, providing options for -h completion from .pgpass would be neat too.) BTW while reading the psql manpage I noticed this statement: A popular application of this facility is to refer to the last inserted OID in subsequent statements to build a foreign key scenario. (This refers to :foo interpolation.) Talking about popular application of OIDs in FKs seems so 90's. Should we remove that phrase? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: