Re: [mmoncure@gmail.com: Re: [GENERAL] array_to_set functions]
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [mmoncure@gmail.com: Re: [GENERAL] array_to_set functions] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200803121514.m2CFEd812654@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [mmoncure@gmail.com: Re: [GENERAL] array_to_set functions] ("Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Added to TODO: * Add array_accum() and array_to_set() functions for arrays http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-08/msg00464.php --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Merlin Moncure wrote: > On 8/14/07, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > > > TODO item? > > I would say yes...array_accum is virtually an essential function when > working with arrays and the suggested array_to_set (and it's built in > cousin, _pg_expand_array) really should not be built around > generate_series when a C function is faster and will scale much > better. > > array_to_set, as suggested in SQL, is something only a relative expert > with PostgreSQL could be expected to write. > > Thus could generate_series be relieved from providing the only core > function for set returning functions in the documentation. IMO, this > part of the documentation could use some expansion anyways :) > > merlin > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: