Re: Contributor List policy
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Contributor List policy |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200803120123.25961.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Contributor List policy (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Contributor List policy
Re: Contributor List policy |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Monday 10 March 2008 21:55, Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > > ... there should be two lists, of which you > > would definitely be label'd a 'Major Contributor' ... > > I've been thinking that for awhile. Core is in a good position to see > who are major or minor code contributors, but we are not so well placed > to see who's contributing in a non-code fashion. A large part of the problem is that Joshua, for quite some time now, has been trying to change the definition of what the contributors on this page means. Granted he has been smart about it, getting little things changed over time to get closer and closer to his end goal. In the past we kept it with the original spirit of the page, which was to recgonize those who have made contributions that help further the core project. Core is generally in a good position to know who those people are (or at least come to agreement with some minimal prodding). -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: