Re: Contributor List policy
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Contributor List policy |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200803120056.22978.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Contributor List policy (Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Monday 10 March 2008 21:59, Dan Langille wrote: > On Mar 10, 2008, at 9:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > >> ... there should be two lists, of which you > >> would definitely be label'd a 'Major Contributor' ... > > > > I've been thinking that for awhile. Core is in a good position to see > > who are major or minor code contributors, but we are not so well > > placed > > to see who's contributing in a non-code fashion. If there's going to > > be recognition for non-code contributions I'd be happy to see that > > be a > > separate list managed by someone else. How this all gets presented on > > the website (one page or several?) is not clear. > > I always like to look at how others have done this before. > And I am always fascinated how we don't look at how we have done it in the past. -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: