Re: What is the maximum encoding-conversion growth rate, anyway?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What is the maximum encoding-conversion growth rate, anyway? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200803111945.m2BJj2w09898@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What is the maximum encoding-conversion growth rate, anyway? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Added to TODO: * Change memory allocation for multi-byte functions so memory is allocated inside conversion functions Currently we preallocate memory based on worst-case usage. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tom Lane wrote: > Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> writes: > > Thinking more, it striked me that users can define arbitarily growing > > rate by using CFREATE CONVERSION. So it seems we need functionality to > > define the growing rate anyway. > > Seems to me that would be an argument for moving the palloc inside the > conversion functions, as I suggested before. > > In practice though, I find it hard to imagine a pair of encodings for > which the growth rate is more than 3x. You'd need something that > translates a single-byte character into 4 or more bytes (pretty > unlikely, especially considering we require all these encodings to be > ASCII supersets); or something that translates a 2-byte character into > more than 6 bytes. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > match -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: