Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080311133245.2660c557@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:17:53 -0400 (EDT) Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > > > Particularly consider using psql to restore a pg_dump > > > dump --- are we going to add "SET statement_timeout=0" > > > to the pg_dump file? > > > > I hope not. That should be the user's choice. > > Would anyone want to limit the load time for pg_dump? I can hardly > see why. I have to agree with Bruce here. You restore a backup because your hosed something or you are building a dev environment. These are both boolean results that should end in TRUE :) Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake - -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL political pundit | Mocker of Dolphins -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH1uxyATb/zqfZUUQRAvyWAKCATrKgRQygjveXSrY0KIptvKYZJQCgg87z XrXncZ8d2Qyf61Wtc+OtHXg= =rBaK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: