Re: Cleaner API for appendStringInfoVA

Patch rejected.  Sorry.  Comment is:

The patch of very dubious portability and I'm not even convinced that
it'd provide a net performance improvement.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Marko Kreen wrote:
> Attached patch moves decision how much more room to allocate
> from callers of appendStringInfoVA to inside the function,
> where more info is available.
>
> On systems with broken vsnprintf() it falls back
> to doubleing the buffer.
>
> Fixme: the +1 could be something larger?  Aligned?
>
> --
> marko

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
>                http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +