Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200803051509.m25F9cs11343@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>) |
Список | pgsql-docs |
Richard Huxton wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Richard Huxton wrote: > >> Bruce Momjian wrote: > >>> David Fetter wrote: > >>>> If you really need to embed an > >>>> SQL engine in a binary, consider the excellent > >>>> <a href="http://www.sqlite.org/">SQLite</a> > >> or <a href="http://http://www.firebirdsql.org/">Firebird</a> > >> > >>>> for the purpose. > >> Just to be fair. > > > > sqlite seems much more appropriate for embedding. > > It's certainly the lightest DB I'm aware of, but Firebird does have an > embedded mode (apparentl - I tend to use a different DB :-) Right. The issue with Firebird is it does both embedded and traditional, while sqlite is only embedded, so is probably a better choice for that purpose. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: