Re: Proposed changes to DTrace probe implementation
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposed changes to DTrace probe implementation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080227092819.GH5916@svr2.hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposed changes to DTrace probe implementation (Robert Lor <Robert.Lor@Sun.COM>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposed changes to DTrace probe implementation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:48:28PM -0600, Robert Lor wrote: > Gregory Stark wrote: > >I think both types of probes are useful to different people. > > > I think certain higher level probes can be really useful to DBAs. > >Perhaps looking at the standard database SNMP MIB counters would give us a > >place to start for upward facing events people want to trace for databases > >in > >general. > > > Great idea. I found this link for public RDBMS MIB > http://www.mnlab.cs.depaul.edu/cgi-bin/sbrowser.cgi?HOST=&OID=RDBMS-MIB!rdbmsMIB > > The stats in rdbmsSrvInfoTable is quite useful, and it's one of the > tables that Oracle implements in their SNMP support. > http://download-east.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14099_19/manage.1012/b16244/appdx_d_rdbms.htm Incidentally, most of that's already supported by the pg snmp provider, through the stats system. //Magnus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: