Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080226191836.GL5763@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > > IMO the place to start is COPY which is per my tests, slow. Multi > > worker connection restore is great and I have proven that with some > > work it can provide o.k. results but it is certainly not acceptable. > > It was already pointed out to you that we can hope for only incremental > speedups in COPY per se. Don't be too quick to dismiss the discussion > of large-grain parallelism, because I don't see anything else within > reach that might give integer multiples rather than percentage points. Well, one idea would be dividing the input file in similarly-sized parts and giving each one to a different COPY process. This would help in cases where you have a single very large table to restore. Another thing we could do is selective binary output/input for bytea columns, to avoid the escaping step. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: