Re: disabling an index without deleting it?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: disabling an index without deleting it? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080226143738.05d2cb78@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: disabling an index without deleting it? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:22:40 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > > "Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote: > >> begin; > >> drop index abc_dx; > >> select .... > >> rollback; > >> > >> and viola, your index is still there. note that there are likely > >> some locking issues with this, so be careful with it in > >> production. But on a test box it's a very easy way to test > >> various indexes. > > > Wouldn't you also bloat the index? > > No, what makes you think that? Well now that I am obviously wrong :P. I was thinking about it from the: BEGIN; DELETE FROM ROLLBACK; Perspective. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake - -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHxJSyATb/zqfZUUQRAnSPAJkB6Gz0gUTPohXcFak9LbVYIdxCtwCfWvxp gQZymMaKEXfo2Mf1E2BWtUk= =p+EO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: