Re: 8.3 / 8.2.6 restore comparison

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:36:56 -0800
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:

> 
> If there is any significant I/O latency for a single backend, it seems
> like a context switch could be a win for processor utilization. It
> might not be a win overall, but at least potentially a win.

Do we want a 20% potential win or an 80% potential win?

I would personally rather keep it simple, hard core, and data shoving
as possible without any issue with scheduling etc..

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


- -- 
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director |  PostgreSQL political pundit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHwx+EATb/zqfZUUQRAvOgAJ4vWCO74XzXy9Pbzqz3otWoqKI3HgCfRwUI
ZLd0SOgf5jnInZvOxCS+iNU=
=Syk1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----