Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default
От | D'Arcy J.M. Cain |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080222110318.160843d8.darcy@druid.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default ("Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default
Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 07:37:55 +0000 "Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: > I know I'm gonna regret wading in on this, but in my mind this is akin > to one of the arguments for including tsearch in the core server - > namely that too many brain dead hosting providers won't add a contrib > module or anything else in a customer's database because they don't So their clients will go somewhere <PLUG URL="http://www.Vex.Net/" /> that does understand what they are installing and can support their users properly. How far are we supposed to go to support the clueless? > understand that just because it's not there by default doesn't mean > it's in any way second rate. Including pl/pgsql in template1 will help > those folks who forwhatever reason use such providers, whilst more > savvy providers can easily disable it post-initdb if thats what they > want to do. And the first time someone uses pl/pgsql to do harm, even if it is due to their mis-configuration, who gets blamed? -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: