Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default

On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:11:05PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> > Let's put PL/PgSQL in template1 by default, as some downstream
> > packagers are already doing.  If someone really must remove it,
> > they can still do that.
> 
> This has been proposed before, and rejected before.  Have you got
> any new arguments?

The longer it's been since the last vuln in PL/PgSQL, the harder it is
to argue for having it not be there by default.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate