Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080219153057.0eea830a@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:13:53 -0500 Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > I am having trouble locating the previous thread - can someone please > point me at it? I am having trouble finding one that makes a cohesive argument against but here we go: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-sql/2000-05/msg00215.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-04/msg00952.php Of course there are tons of results of users wondering why we don't offer such as simple and useful feature. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake - -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHu2ayATb/zqfZUUQRAmL7AJoCQyNmbLIbZNXG9JjMQu2ax/vRJQCfcevF TF6TzTSr/1ep8PuSNMcGK2g= =bFqN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: