Re: NetBSD/dtime_t

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Meskes
Тема Re: NetBSD/dtime_t
Дата
Msg-id 20080216090048.GA6702@feivel.credativ.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: NetBSD/dtime_t  (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>)
Ответы Re: NetBSD/dtime_t  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 05:07:17PM -0500, Kris Jurka wrote:
>> Could anyone please tell me how NetBSD defines dtime_t? We have a
>> buildfarm failure on canary.
>
> /usr/include/sys/types.h says:
>
> typedef int32_t         dtime_t;        /* on-disk time_t */

Thanks. I wonder why they define this datatype. I didn't find it on any
other architecture.

Anyway, does anyone have a suggestion how to solve this issue? Informix
uses the dtime_t datatype to store a timestamp. pgtypeslib also defines
a timestamp type which is 64 bit and not 32 bit like the NetBSD one.
Informix compatibility now typedefs dtime_t to timestamp so the
functions with Informix syntax work as advertized.

If I do not define this datatype, Informix compatibility will not work,
if I define it, NetBSD is not able to compile to regression tests. Of
course we can work around the regression test problem, but a user using
the Informix compatibility feature on NetBSD will run into the same
problem.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org
Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: PG-relevant bug fixes just pushed in Fedora 8
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: NetBSD/dtime_t