On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 06:58:25PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I vote we just decide that GSS isn't going to be supported on protocol
> >> V2, and put a suitable error message into the server for that. It
> >> doesn't seem to me that this combination is worth the amount of
> >> contortions it would require to support.
>
> > Agreed. The cost is rapidly becoming too high. But we certainly can't
> > change the protocol for the stuff that actually does work.
>
> This problem applies to SSPI too, correct?
Yeah, they work the same way.
//Magnus