Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200801311513.m0VFDoR24185@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dimitri Fontaine wrote: -- Start of PGP signed section. > Hi, > > Le jeudi 31 janvier 2008, Tom Lane a ?crit?: > > We have *never* promised that pg_dump version N could dump from server > > version N+1 .., in fact, personally I'd like to make that case be a hard > > error, rather than something people could override with -i. > > Are you thinking about next major or minor version ? All the same? > Is there some real good reason not to dump say 8.2.6 server with the pg_dump > from an 8.2.5 installation? They are talking about cross-major dumps, 8.2 pg_dump dumping an 8.3 database. They are saying that should be disallowed. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: