Re: [pgsql-www] Setting up for Press Contacts inSE Asia
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-www] Setting up for Press Contacts inSE Asia |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080129114211.GE22065@svr2.hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-www] Setting up for Press Contacts inSE Asia ("Dave Page" <dpage@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:36:43AM +0000, Dave Page wrote: > On Jan 29, 2008 11:11 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:03:36AM +0000, Dave Page wrote: > > > On Jan 29, 2008 9:48 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > > > > > > > The client machine(s) that shuold be allowed to connect to the database. > > > > > > Is there any need for that? Whats wrong with ssh tunneling? > > > > SSH tunneling requires a shell account on the machine. > > You just suggested using psql locally, so I assumed that wasn't an > issue. Regardless, I'd much rather Josh used ssh for everything - it's > far more flexible, arguably more secure (think ssh cert + postgres > auth), and doesn't require any special config. This doesn't really belong on advocacy, so let me just post the reason here, and take further discussions off-list. psql locally = locally on his box, *not* wwwmaster, is what I meant. We don't want end-users running *anything* on wwwmaster. This is the reason we made it it's own VM. We do *not* want the mess of svr1 all over again. An option could be to have Josh run his scripts on svr1, since that's the closest thing to a "shell box" that we have for project users. Yes, it's a mess, but it works for that :-P //Magnus
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: