Re: A FAQ that needs updating?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A FAQ that needs updating? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080129100240.0fc4a7cb@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A FAQ that needs updating? (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:59:34 -0500 (EST) Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > All redundant information should be removed between the general and > > press advocacy sections. > > > > Add a section on the FAQ page for the Advocacy & Press section that > > links to the section within the general FAQ. > > > > Appropriate rewrites put in place to push all requests for the old > > FAQ to the new (and proper) one. > > I wasn't going to go that far at this point. I was just suggesting > removing the bottom three items that are related to the 8.3 release. > I know I saw but I prefer solutions over fixes :). I do not oppose your suggestion. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake - -- The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/ Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHn2pAATb/zqfZUUQRAnvVAJ4rVvq+x5XbCh31N5A2i8fcIEFqMACfUJE3 iGKoRZZAPEN+rD3rti8gfLY= =UBrg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: