Re: Drop set problem - pgAdmin / Slony I
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Drop set problem - pgAdmin / Slony I |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080118160915.GN7353@svr2.hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Drop set problem - pgAdmin / Slony I (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Drop set problem - pgAdmin / Slony I
|
Список | pgadmin-support |
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 11:07:27AM -0500, Christopher Browne wrote: > >> > > I've had this happen before. Removing the cluster and setting it > >> > up > >> > > again resolves the problem, however once we are in a production > >> > > environment I can't go dropping the whole cluster and replicating > >> > all > >> > > the tables from scratch when it happens. > >> > > >> > Can you give us an exact step-by-step on how to make it happen? > >> > > >> > >> I tried to subscribe a new set with a new table in it and for some > >> reason it failed with the error mentioned. The slony logs show that > >> slony was periodically trying to subscribe on the subscriber. > > > > I mean complete step-to-step, as in exactly what you click and enter. I've > > done what is at least on the surface the same thing you have, with no > > problems. So there must be somethign in the details. > > > >> Seeing as I couldn't remove it from pgAdmin, I went in and ran a > >> slonik script to drop the set, however I didn't try to unsubscribe it > >> with slonik first. So is there a chance it's come about from me not > >> unsubscribing first? > > > > Part of it may - I don't recall offhand it the must-unsubscribe-first is a > > rqeuirement of Slonik or just of pgAdmin. > > You don't need to unsubscribe first. > > The stored procedure dropSet() is perfectly happy to drop the set at > any time. When the event propagates, it'll happily clear out all > traces of the set. Ok. Good. Then I think the reason it's not supported in pgAdmin is simply because it made the GUI simpler to require that ;-) //Magnus
В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления: