Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:44:41 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:

> pl/PgSQL already is aimed at being Oracle compatible so why complain
> that the author wants to use Oracle syntax if possible.  If you don't
> care, that is fine, but as a project we do, at least in helping people
> migrate to Postgres from other databases.
> 

This appears to be the, "can't follow written points day". Magnus has
already given up on a thread on advocacy. I give up here.

Joshua D. Drake


- -- 
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD'


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHj5dmATb/zqfZUUQRAgtDAJ9H8igJII+kyAxarEFwtPMhe3GG+ACeLOjq
p9MZzOrDM2z3nDGw2H2c1Og=
=UnFv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----