Re: Egad, what a lot of spammage
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Egad, what a lot of spammage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080116170208.GD5076@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Egad, what a lot of spammage (User Scrappy <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
User Scrappy wrote: > > > On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Dave Page wrote: > >> On 16/01/2008, Tino Wildenhain <tino@wildenhain.de> wrote: >>> Personally I'd prefer them to be rejected inband so the legitimate >>> sender learns about the problem and reformulate the message accordingly. >> >> The problem with that is that for 1 legitimate message, there's a >> dozen or more from harvested addresses, the real owners of which won't >> have a clue what the bounce message is about. > > Same applies to virus' ... most are forged emails, so sending an email back > to the Sender saying 'your computer is infect' would both generate alot of > traffic, and confuse the hell out of the person that didn't send the > message in the first place :( Perhaps we could reject SPF failures? At least people with SPF-enabled domains would not need to get bogus bounces. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: