Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20080107092753.69ae891f@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory ("Holger Hoffstaette" <holger@wizards.de>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:33:53 +0100 "Holger Hoffstaette" <holger@wizards.de> wrote: > On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 10:57:53 -0500, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > > > Note that you should almost never use VACUUM FULL unless you've > > really messed things up. I understand from the thread that you're > > just testing things out right now. But VACUUM FULL is not > > something you should _ever_ need in production, if you've set > > things up correctly. > > Then why does it exist? Is it a historical leftover? If it is > only needed for emergency, should it not have a different name? > Just curious.. There are times when it is required, usually when people don't configure normal vacuum/autovacuum correctly. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > Holger > > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our > list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > - -- The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/ Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD' -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHgmEbATb/zqfZUUQRAoyXAJ9GB4lXGr6UsEMpdT4KDvtIkRv+ywCdEMQV T07KuT+OUWcrr9NEX+blSuQ= =rDNL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: