Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:33:45AM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:

[...]

> The main proposal deliberately has few, if any, knobs and dials. That's
> a point of philosophy that I've had views on previously: my normal
> stance is that we need some knobs to allow the database to be tuned to
> individual circumstances. 

One thought I had back then, with partitioned tables was "gee -- B-tree
index is already doing a partition; why do a manual partition on top of
that?".

It's an exhilarating experience to watch you making a design before I
could even spell this nebulous and unclear thougt :-)

Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHf3v7Bcgs9XrR2kYRApP7AJwIW1cQwdK99fl+uzDelGEaqZFnEgCfUNjl
y0zGzkhf6qel/FC+rArxQu8=
=FZuv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----