Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers
От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080103102331.GA30497@svana.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers ("Gokulakannan Somasundaram" <gokul007@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 01:08:47PM +0530, Gokulakannan Somasundaram wrote: > Can you please explain, any specific use-case where DDLs are necessary > within a transaction? I don't think they are ever necessary, they're just very very nice. For example: - You want a new column to appear populated on a table atomically. You do a BEGIN; add column; update set column=foo; add foreign key; COMMIT - Installation of external modules can be done atomically, so you don't end up with half installed contrib modules. - Principle of Least Surprise. Automatic commit for any reason seems wrong. - Temporarily disabling triggers/indexes/constraints, if the system aborts/crashes, the triggers are reinstated automatically. - Just general niceity of being able to test schema changes without immediatly changing the system. There are many more... Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable. > -- John F Kennedy
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: