Re: pg_dump and languages
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump and languages |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20077.1101510670@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump and languages (Adrian Klaver <aklaver@comcast.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump and languages
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Adrian Klaver <aklaver@comcast.net> writes: > Sorry should have been more explicit. The dump loaded functions depending on > plsh before the function that created the language. In fact it did not > instalI the language at all. Ah. Looking back at your first message, I see you'd installed plsh into the pg_catalog schema rather than a user schema. pg_dump specifically doesn't dump anything that appears in pg_catalog; it assumes all of that stuff is supplied by the system. So the above is expected behavior. I haven't looked at plsh, but if it installs stuff directly into pg_catalog, I'd call that a mistake. At least it shouldn't be the default behavior. (Note for pedantry's sake: a language doesn't really belong to any particular schema; but its support functions do, and pg_dump treats the language as belonging to the same schema as the support functions.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: