Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20073.904530880@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here
Re: [HACKERS] flock patch breaks things here |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > either way, moving the pid file (or > socket, for that matter) from /tmp should be listed as a security related > requirement for v6.4 :) Huh? There is no pid file being generated in /tmp (or anywhere else) at the moment. If we do add one, it should not go into /tmp for the reasons I gave before. Where the Unix-domain socket file lives is an entirely separate issue. If we move the socket out of /tmp then we have just kicked away all the work we did to preserve backwards compatibility of the FE/BE protocol with existing clients. Being able to talk to a 1.0 client isn't much good if you aren't listening where he's going to try to contact you. So I think I have to vote in favor of leaving the socket where it is. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: