Re: Spoofing as the postmaster
От | D'Arcy J.M. Cain |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Spoofing as the postmaster |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20071229105920.e6c7cd8c.darcy@druid.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Spoofing as the postmaster (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Spoofing as the postmaster
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 10:38:13 -0500 Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > > > D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: > > - 1: How does the client assure that the postmaster is legit > > - 2: How does the postmaster assure that the client is legit > > And neither answers the original problem: Which seems to have been lost in the noise. > 3. How can the sysadmin prevent a malicious local user from hijacking > the sockets if the postmaster isn't running? A better way of stating it for sure. > Prevention is much more valuable than ex post detection, IMNSHO. > > Probably the first answer is not to run postgres on a machine with > untrusted users, but that's not always possible. Maybe we can't find a > simple cross-platform answer, but that doesn't mean we should not look > at platform-specific answers, at least for documentation. Yes, that's what I said at the start of this discussion. If you don't trust the users with actual access to the box, the rest of this is pretty much academic. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: