Re: [Fwd: [PATCHES] archiver ps display]

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 10:55 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> > I agree that replication should be able to be monitored.  However,
> > isn't ps_display supposed to show what the process is _currently_ doing?
> > So if the archiver finishes processing a file, its display should go
> > back to "idle" or some such.  (Perhaps "idle, last archived XXXYYYZZZ")
> 
> That was my first thought, but that ends up with the archiver ps display
> being mostly blank, and so isn't really very useful.

What about the second suggestion?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera       Valdivia, Chile   ICBM: S 39º 49' 18.1", W 73º 13' 56.4"
"We are who we choose to be", sang the goldfinch
when the sun is high (Sandman)