Re: Proposed patch to disallow password=foo in database name parameter
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposed patch to disallow password=foo in database name parameter |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20071211122246.GE4708@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposed patch to disallow password=foo in database name parameter (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposed patch to disallow password=foo in databasename
parameter
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 10:47:19PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > If we want to prevent it for psql, we should actually prevent it *in* psql, > not in libpq. There are an infinite number of scenarios where it's > perfectly safe to put the password there... If we want to do it share, we > should add a function like PQSanitizeConnectionString() that will remove > it, that can be called from those client apps that may be exposing it. > > There are also platforms that don't show the full commandline to other > users - or even other processes - that aren't affected, of course. One idea is to have psql "hide" the password on the ps status. That way it becomes less of a security issue. It would still be a problem on certain operating systems, but at least several common platforms would be covered. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.flickr.com/photos/alvherre/ Officer Krupke, what are we to do? Gee, officer Krupke, Krup you! (West Side Story, "Gee, Officer Krupke")
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: