Re: Release Note Changes
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Release Note Changes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200712102226.lBAMQBR08337@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Release Note Changes ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Release Note Changes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >> Bruce Momjian wrote: > >>> Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >>>> I assumed the white paper would have proper attribution. > >>> Right, but is the white paper going to be thorough to mention _all_ > >>> changes? > >>> > >> Hmmm good question which gets back to where we started :). My very first > >> thought on all of this was that we would list all notable changes but > >> that we wouldn't mention anyone's name. > > > > Isn't that listing what is already in the release notes? > > > > No :). What is listed already in the release notes is what "you" think > is notable, which is why I mention the subjective below. What is cool to > you may not be cool to others etc... I am not saying you are doing a bad > job just that it is subjective. > > Case in point I think the work that Stefan did for this release is > notable. I believe it is notable for several reasons. > > 1. Usability > > 2. Recognition (yes I am aware of the thoughts on that) > > 3. It was grunt work that should have been done with the original patch > that didn't get done. Stefan picked up the ball and ran with it and > produced something that will make our product more usable for the end user. > > Tom and you disagreed. I understand the reasoning and I don't actually > disagree with the thought process but I think the thought process is > flawed. I do not believe people only look at the release notes for "wow > cool". I believe they look at them to see who deserves kudos in this > release. OK, that was clear to me. You are saying based on the criteria we have used in the past our system of feedback works (good), but the criteria used isn't 100% agreed. My point is that it isn't that I am too subjective and closed to feedback on adding/removing items, but rather the policy used isn't open for feedback; but it really is. Should we open discussion of changing the policy? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: