Re: whats the deal with -u ?
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: whats the deal with -u ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20071210020518.GB7240@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: whats the deal with -u ? (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark wrote: > "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > > > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > >> I have never understood what's the point of having an option to force a > >> password prompt. I wonder why don't we deprecate -W? > > > > It's not *completely* useless, because you only need one connection > > attempt not two --- normally, psql gets rejected once before figuring > > out that it must ask for a password. > > Hm, I wonder if this fixes one of the annoyances of kerberos support. If you > have kerberos tickets psql uses the principal name from them rather than your > unix username. If you don't actually use kerberos authentication for your > postgres server then that means you have to specify the user on the command > line all the time. Huh, isn't this solved by just setting PGUSER? (In any case I doubt -W has any effect on it.) -- Alvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile ICBM: S 39º 49' 18.1", W 73º 13' 56.4" "La vida es para el que se aventura"
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: