Re: whats the deal with -u ?
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: whats the deal with -u ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200712091400.04006.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: whats the deal with -u ? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: whats the deal with -u ?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sunday 09 December 2007 13:33, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes: > > 1) I don't recall why -u was ever deprecated (and honestly postgresql is > > the only program I know which uses -U rather than -u) but maybe we should > > revert to -u and deprecate -U instread? > > You appear to think that -u and -U are supposed to be equivalent. > You are incorrect. -u forces prompts for username and password. > Ah, you're right, I didn't realize that (probably because nothing in the warnings seem to indicate that). However I think all of my questions still remain valid, if not becoming even further re-encforced: rob@ridley:~$ ~rob/devel/postgresql/83/bin/psql -h localhost -u -p 5483 psql: Warning: The -u option is deprecated. Use -U. If I wanted to prompt for a username, why is it telling me to use -U? If we've deemed that's not a valid behavior to want, see questions 1,2 & 3 from upthread :-) -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: