Re: [DOCS] Re: Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation?
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [DOCS] Re: Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20071206085416.GA18541@svr2.hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [DOCS] Re: Uniform policy for author credits in contrib
module documentation?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 10:46:51PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > >As of CVS HEAD, some of the contrib module documentation pages have > >extensive credit screeds, eg > >http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/cube.html > >and some just have the author's name, with or without an <email> link, > >and some don't have anything at all. > > >I don't have a strong opinion one way or the other, except that I think > >we should have a uniform policy for all the contrib modules. > > Well once we push directly into the core documentation I agree that > outside of release notes (although you just brought that up in another > thread) we don't need to be mentioning contributions like that. Those > who have contributed are in the logs. > > Further those who have provided reasonable contribution really should be > mentioned on the contributors page that is up for discussion which would > make the rest of this moot yes? +1, since they are listed in the release notes when the contrib modules are added - just like any other piece of code. IMO no reason to treat contrib differently from any other code in this case. //Magnus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: