Re: BUG #3790: pg_restore error canceling statement due to user request
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #3790: pg_restore error canceling statement due to user request |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20071203235650.GB9782@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: BUG #3790: pg_restore error canceling statement due to user request (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BUG #3790: pg_restore error canceling statement due touser request
Re: BUG #3790: pg_restore error canceling statement due to user request |
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Bruce Momjian escribió: > Magnus Hagander wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 10:13:53AM +0000, Gregory Stark wrote: > > > > > > "Mike C." <smith.not.western@gmail.com> writes: > > > > > > > I don't know if this is either a wording change, or a more serious bug, but > > > > when I do a pg_restore (from a 8.1.9 setup) to a fresh 8.3beta3 created > > > > database (createdb command only), I repeatedly see: > > > > > > > > ERROR: canceling statement due to user request > > > > CONTEXT: automatic analyze of table "dbs.public.entity_event" > > > > > > This is intentional, though perhaps the wording is confusing. What impression > > > does the wording give you? Does it make you think something has gone wrong? > > > > The fact that it says ERROR kind of hints that something has gone wrong, > > no? (so yes, I agree the wording isn't very good) > > What is causing this? Statement_timeout? I see different wording for > that behavior. Is the postmaster getting a signal from somewhere on the > system? It's the new autovacuum cancel stuff. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/CTMLCN8V17R4 "That sort of implies that there are Emacs keystrokes which aren't obscure. I've been using it daily for 2 years now and have yet to discover any key sequence which makes any sense." (Paul Thomas)
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: