Re: [GENERAL] Empty arrays with ARRAY[]
От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Empty arrays with ARRAY[] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20071129194816.GD30574@svana.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Empty arrays with ARRAY[] ("Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Empty arrays with ARRAY[]
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 06:13:20AM +1100, Brendan Jurd wrote: > Hi folks, > > The patch is coming along nicely now. I do have a couple of questions > about the implementation in transformArrayExpr though. Awesome. > 1) How should we determine whether the array is multidimensional if we > know the type in advance? Well, given the array should be regular you should be able to just look at the first element, if it's a array look at it's first element, etc to determine the dimensions. This'll be fairly quick. > 2) Should the typecast propagate downwards into nested array elements? IMHO yes, you have th einfo you may as well use it. > If we have a nested array written as, say, ARRAY[ARRAY[1, 2], ARRAY[3, > 4], ARRAY[5, 6]]::float[], should we treat the inner arrays the same > way as the outer array (with the advance knowledge that the array type > should be float[])? TBH, I think you're going to have to go through the whole array to coerce them and check, so you may as well determine the dimensions at the same time. In general I think it's better to mark the type up front. In don't know if you should actually do the conversion straight away, but at least you don't need to guess the type anymore. Hope this helps, Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable. > -- John F Kennedy
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: