Re: Can we please refuse mail to the list from list addresses?
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Can we please refuse mail to the list from list addresses? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20071129121944.GC6226@crankycanuck.ca обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Can we please refuse mail to the list from list addresses? ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Can we please refuse mail to the list from list addresses?
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 03:04:48PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Wait, I think we're talking two different things here ... at least, I hope JD > is ... SMTP AUTH is required to send email *through* any of our servers, except Aha. > MX ... but, what Magnus was proposing would have required CMD to setup their > MTA to do an SMTP AUTH to postgresql.org's MTA to send @postgresql.org ... Well, this is possible, but it does make the mail server admin rather more troublesome. > > ie. if joshua@postgresql.org sent out email, it would deliver to his local MTA, > with his local MTA connecting to postgresql.org MTA, who would then deliver it > out to the world ... Right. In the anti-spam world these days, very few people are doing reverse matching (that is, very few people compare the reverse lookup of the From: address to the domain of the MTA whence the mail is coming). It'll be interesting to see what happens as SPF or DKIM -- the two loaded foot-guns of the mail world -- take off, because then signing practices will start to be important, and I suspect we'll find that mail not signed with the right keys will all be classed as spam anyway. So then you'll _have_ to use the domain's own mail servers, or things won't be signed correctly (because I assume that we're not going to be sharing the server's private keys widely :-) A -- Andrew Sullivan Old sigs will return after re-constitution of blue smoke
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: