Re: Can we please refuse mail to the list from list addresses?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Can we please refuse mail to the list from list addresses? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20071129095517.590ba275@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Can we please refuse mail to the list from list addresses? (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:49:03 -0500 Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 07:55:23AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > Your point? Most companies need to be hit with a cluestick, that > > doesn't mean they don't do it. There is a very large free wifi > > provider near me that actually blocks anything that doesn't have > > www. E.g; they don't block ports, they blocks names! > > The only way that will ever improve is if (1) people point out why > what they're doing is stupid and (2) people who are willing to pay > for real ISP service stop using them. The IETF has, for instance, > been using Hiltons a lot recently, and as a result the general > brain-deadedness of their in-room ISP service has been going down. > It costs real money to hire non-stupid DBAs; why would we assume that > the cheapest ISP knows what it's doing? I don't but... :) unless they are going to pay me to fix it, I am going to use an ssh tunnel to get around it and ignore them. No it doesn't help the greater good, but I have work to do and am not going to sit on the phone with some lame isp trying to explain to them why they are idiots. I have better things to do. > > > >Nobody should be using "direct SMTP" as such in this day and age. > > >That's what the submission port is for. > > > > That may be correct but it certainly isn't reality. > > Everyone who continues to insist that this "reality" must continue is > a willing contributor to the spambot world. There is a well-defined, > clear facility for you to show that your mail is legit. If you are > unwilling to use it, you are just contributing to the problem. That > said, I agree with you. (The publication of the recent BCP may be > enough to get my own ISP to fix their stupidity :( -- see the > headers!) Could you explain the actual different please? A spambot can't use CMD to send email, how does the submission port make any difference? Joshua D. Drake - -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHTv0FATb/zqfZUUQRAnEsAJ9pWWPMqhk34b60Nm2yye1bKbekkACeO/jz YHvZG2egDGxCZd6lnuO6ov4= =R97a -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: