Re: TB-sized databases
От | Bill Moran |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TB-sized databases |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20071128082716.91bbad9c.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TB-sized databases (Matthew <matthew@flymine.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: TB-sized databases
Re: TB-sized databases Re: TB-sized databases |
Список | pgsql-performance |
In response to Matthew <matthew@flymine.org>: > On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Pablo Alcaraz wrote: > > it would be nice to do something with selects so we can recover a rowset > > on huge tables using a criteria with indexes without fall running a full > > scan. > > You mean: Be able to tell Postgres "Don't ever do a sequential scan of > this table. It's silly. I would rather the query failed than have to wait > for a sequential scan of the entire table." > > Yes, that would be really useful, if you have huge tables in your > database. Is there something wrong with: set enable_seqscan = off ? -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/ wmoran@collaborativefusion.com Phone: 412-422-3463x4023
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: