Re: BUG #3760: Comment on restore database
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #3760: Comment on restore database |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200711191927.lAJJRFF09412@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #3760: Comment on restore database (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #3760: Comment on restore database
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Malcus Imhof wrote: > > > Yea, the dump thinks it is going into the same database. I don't see > > any way of fixing that. We don't allow functions for the object name. > > If we did we could use current_database(). Fortunately I think it is > > the only place where the database name is hardcoded in the dump. > > The easiest would be to add new syntax, > COMMENT ON CURRENT DATABASE IS 'foo' Yea, probably. I have added that as possible syntax to the TODO list. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: