Re: pg_ctl -t N register ??
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_ctl -t N register ?? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200711161738.lAGHc8028867@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | pg_ctl -t N register ?? (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_ctl -t N register ??
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Hi, > > I just noticed that the "pg_ctl register" synopsis was updated to have a > -t parameter. This does not seem to make sense to me. Is it correct? > Does it do anything? > > My thinking is that we should just remove the -t from that synopsis. Well, Peter added it, but register already had the -w parameter, so either register needs both -t and -w, or it needs neither of them. I don't know which is true. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: