Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > I am still desperately unhappy with the choice to put the contrib docs
> > where they were put.  They are by no stretch of the imagination part of
> > the "SQL Language", and there is no defense for having inserted them
> > into the middle of the part, in front of substantially more widely
> > interesting information such as concurrency control.
>
> I think we need to decide where they will go;  they are easy to move.
>
> > Furthermore, labeling them "Standard Modules" is somebody's flight of
> > wishful thinking --- if they were installed by default, they'd deserve
> > such a title, but that's not happening any time soon.
>
> That name needs adjustment too.

How about "Additional Supplied Modules"?

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +