Re: Segmentation fault using digest from pg_crypto
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Segmentation fault using digest from pg_crypto |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200711110345.lAB3jIv15903@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Segmentation fault using digest from pg_crypto (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Segmentation fault using digest from pg_crypto
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> If you don't re-run a contrib module's sql script then you don't get any > >> new functions that may have been added to the module. So I think the > >> real issue here is that we ought to deprecate the idea of skipping that > >> step, period. > > > The good news is that the scripts have CREATE OR REPLACE function so it > > would clean up everything to match the library you just installed. > > Hmm ... now that you mention it: some of them do, some of them don't. > And some of them wrap the whole script in BEGIN/COMMIT, which means that > a conflict against existing definitions would prevent any new > definitions from being added. > > Seems like maybe we need an explicit project policy that contrib scripts > should be able to overwrite an existing older installation properly; > maybe with some error reports, but not failing outright. > > If so, someone will have to do the legwork of really making that happen > ... any volunteers? I have cleaned up the contrib install/uninstall to be more consistent, used CREATE OR REPLACE function consisently, and removed transaction blocks. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: