Re: Syntax error in a large COPY
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Syntax error in a large COPY |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200711080248.lA82m0j23638@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Syntax error in a large COPY ("Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej.groups@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Andrej Ricnik-Bay wrote: > On 11/8/07, Collin Kidder <adderd@kkmfg.com> wrote: > > > I'm with Thomas. I think that, while inline posting is a good thing, > > bottom posting is dead stupid and wastes my time. > Just as bad as top-posting, really. > > > It is far easier to > > follow a thread with top posting as the relevant text is right there at > > the top ready to be read. > The relevant bit being what? Two lines dangling loosely > at the top of a mail? > > You omitted the crucial bit here: > "It is far easier FOR ME WITH MY CURRENT MAIL CLIENT > to follow a thread with top posting ..." > If that's good enough reason for you to ignore RFCs and > complain about the habit on this list, by all means, there's > no point in arguing. But we can flog the dead horse some > more .... Offtopic, but what actually confuses me most is people replying to quoted text and not putting a blank line before their additional text, like above. It makes it very hard for me to quickly see the next text. FYI, I only top post when I want talk talk _about_ the email, like "Is this a TODO item", and put a dashed line under my text so people realize I top-posted and there is nothing new below my text. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: