Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4)
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200711050351.lA53p1R07663@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Proposal: real procedures again (8.4) ("Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
This has been saved for the 8.4 release: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pavel Stehule wrote: > Hello, > > I found lot of discus about this topic. > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.TODO.html > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2003-08/msg00501.php > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-09/msg00734.php > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-08/msg00872.php > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-09/msg00702.php > > There is one result - OUT params for functions. I propose start with > simple goals that we can enhance in future. > > First goal: Procedures support for better conformance with ANSI SQL: > > * procedure returns any only through OUT, INOUT params, > * procedure has own executor, that allows byref params (and own > transaction management in future), > * procedure can be overloaded, > * procedure can not returns recordset or multi recordset, > * procedure doesn't support default parameters, > * SQL statement CALL allows only expression (this proposal doesn't > need session variables) for older environments > * new SPI_exec_procedures API (allows binding to host variables) and > some similar in libpq, that allow CALL implementation in pgsql and > others. > * new internal exec_exec_proc (allow ref on datum variable) used in > plpgsql statement CALL. > * new V2 calling convention (maybe based on SQL/CLI) > * no changes in current functions support > > Later: > * procedure can manages transactions, > * procedure can returns recordset or multi recordset, > * procedure allows default parameters, > * CALL statement allows session variables > * no changes in current functions support > > Why new calling convention? I would to support byref variables and > then I have to carry memory context info ... and maybe some others > > Nice a weekend > > Pavel Stehule > > p.s. > > Why procedures? New parts of ANSI SQL use it, and what is worse, they > use methods: > http://www.wiscorp.com/H2-2005-350-WG4-wlg005-Part-7-History-2nd-Edition-Text-for-Working-Draft.pdf > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at > > http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: